Archive for the 'Google Earth terrain' Category

Mar 14 2011

Shaken Awake – and new terrain product

The enormously tragic megathrust event east of Honshu island in Japan has been in my thoughts throughout the weekend.   It is natural to focus on the human loss and images of civic destruction; I’ve got little to add to that story.

When I saw the first news items, it was already Friday morning and eight hours past the event.  My concerns were for Hawaii and the arrival of a tsunami.  I was shocked by the energy released, as reported at NEIC:  Mo=3.9×10^22 Nm,  Mw=9.0 — for as many earthquakes as have been recorded and studied in Japan, this was a much larger event.  For disaster planning, that is Not A Good Thing.

Moment Tensor USGS/WPHASE  Mo=3.9x10^22 Nm

The beach ball diagram shows compression back up the thrust. Depth of event is 24km

While there was some concern for Hawaii, there is something to be said for the diffraction caused by the long line of seamounts extending northwesterly from the big island.  While the energy won’t be cancelled out, the height of the crest would be widened some.  By the time the tsunami reached California, it was a real concern and a literal wake-up call for emergency workers.  Our damage here was mostly an economic annoyance, with Del Norte county once again taking the brunt of the damage in Crescent City harbor.

With a check-in call to relatives in Hawaii saying everything OK, their eyes and mine turned towards Japan.  As I watched shocking videos of tsunami damage, I struggled to calibrate what I was seeing with my mental model of how fragile most human habitation structures are.  I’ve thought much about the effects of shaking, liquefaction, and occasionally about wildland fire.  I’ve read about losses in Marin county during 1982 flooding where debris flows destroyed houses or literally rolled them end-over-end down a slope.  I’d seen some videos from near Sumatra of debris flowing up streets after waves climbed up the beach.  Yet images from Japan recorded damage unfolding at an entirely worse scale.

My concern became much more engaged when I saw helicopter video of the south end of nuclear power reactor facility Fukushima Daiichi (No. 1).  You see, in the video clip I recognized not the reactor, but the cut slope behind it.  In a very strange sense of model-based deja vu, my memories were unequivocal: “I know that place!”.

Why?  Because about 17 or 18 years ago, I was fortunate to be part of a site design project for the (still yet to be constructed) Unit 7 and Unit 8 reactors.  Fortunate for me, because it was a first opportunity to learn not just ESRI Arc/INFO, but how to work with Bentley CAD software to create a 3D cut slope design.  My small contribution was to create a realization of slope that was  not simply faceted as a buffer surrounding the building footprints, but instead create a semblance of the natural cliff slopes  adjacent to the plant, while meeting the engineering requirements for not-to-exceed slope steepness, and a more natural-looking accumulation of drainage from the slope.

So apparently, after spending a couple of weeks learning to use 3D design software and creating a design that extended the existing cut farther southward, I had an image of the plant, its cliffs, and the breakwater that guided cooling water that stuck with me.  After having the flash of recognition with the video, I opened up Google Maps and found the site on my first inward zoom.  It was a bit spooky.

So now when I watch coverage of hydrogen venting that leads to building explosions, I feel a curious terrain-based sense of connection with the site.  I wish them well, and the safest possible return to production.  The TEPCO power is needed by many people.

And more ominous for the Pacific Northwest, I can’t help but reflect on what a similar megathrust event would mean for Cascadia.  Both Portland and Seattle would be in some sort of peril, although I don’t have a clear understanding of how tsunamis are modeled for either lower Columbia River or for Puget Sound.  But the possibility of a 9.0 megathrust event along the Cascadia subduction zone was a whole lot more abstract for me until last Friday.  It may not be the best time to reflect on it now while Japan is suffering—but the risk to the northwest has been a matter of public record for several years now and it not the time to forget that, either.  An event of that size and location would have tsunami implications both locally, and perhaps a far greater risk for windward Hawaii.

—————-<>—————-

Closer to home,  this past week we’ve created a prototype 3D product that provides a facsimile of our 45cm terrain model—imported to Google SketchUp 8 with a georeferenced orthophoto texture on the terrain.  Things are not fully tuned up yet, but we are able to take TIN and decimated TIN surfaces out of ArcGIS 10, by way of clipping polygons that are interpolated to multipatch (3D multi-polygon features) and then exported to Collada with a KML point for georeference.  The Collada can be imported to SketchUp, at least up so some limit of detail.  Once there, I’m trying now to find the right way to smooth the facets and improve the rendering of the surface without having high-contrast dark facets—because the orthophoto textures are arriving intact and draping over the surface.  Only at the moment, many black facets are covering up almost half of the orthophoto in an aggravating triangular patchwork.

Next step: smoothing within SketchUp.

And inspiration from others who have gotten gridded terrain into SketchUp.

No responses yet

Mar 12 2010

Sharing Terrain With the World – Google Earth style

It’s not fully 3D immersive, but hey, 2-1/2D ain’t half bad. The “dsm40cm” model of Marin County has been published as the county’s default terrain on Google Earth. It’s a great pleasure to work with folks who are not troubled by a county representing its surface on a 40cm single-precision float grid that weighs in at 77 GB. In terms of data bulk, that is about the same as the entire 30-meter version of the US National Elevation Dataset.

What one gets when piling that much detail into a single county of around 520 square miles of land area is every building pad, driveway, and crown of road paving that were resolved. The dsm40cm model was derived from an ESRI Terrain Dataset that incorporates our best available topographic contours (1:4800 scale 10-foot; 1:2400 scale 2-foot,) photogrammetric break and water lines, FEMA LiDAR and NCALM (GeoEarthScope) LiDAR data sets. The Terrain Dataset currently comprises 40 GB of vector GIS data.

When the finely detailed surface grids were first developed, we broke the county up into 20 work areas to maintain ArcGIS 9.3.1 in a stable and productive state, and 30cm posting interval grids were generated that covered the entire county–at least during development. When necessary, these grid tiles were mosaicked with ERDAS Imagine into a single seamless grid. The 40cm version was produced directly as a single seamless grid using ArcGIS 9.4 beta 1, on a workstation imaged with Windows Server 2003. The WGS84 UTM, NAVD88-Geoid 2003 result was provided to the Google Earth team earlier this year.

As with all GIS data sets, it seems, the more detailed it is, the more rapidly it may need updating. In the works for the next year or so are several improvements to the dsm40cm model. First: the photogrammetric break lines will be segregated into steeper sets that tend to run along ridges, and shallower slopes that tend to delineate road cuts and building pads. The ridge set will be used as soft constraints to resolve some artifacts where they rise above some contours.
Second: incorporate new LiDAR data as it becomes available. Some data has already been provided for the lowest part of Lagunitas creek, and it appears that Prof. Ellen Hines of San Francisco State University’s Department of Geography and Human Environmental Studies has been funded by USGS to gather LiDAR county-wide this year.

So there will be revisions, but an exciting aspect is to see data flows being brought into existence that support different levels of mirror world development.
Publishing the dsm40cm model in Google Earth is an important (and beautiful) threshold to cross. Making use of the dsm40cm model in county operations such as creek and watershed delineation will be the practical benefit that drives the work in the first place. And before too many more weeks, there may be entirely new approaches to publishing the data in an immersive environment (neither Second Life nor Opensim) to share.

Building pad in Kent Woodlands shows driveway-level detail

Kent Woodlands building pad and driveway, in the shadow of Mt. Tam

No responses yet

Apr 22 2009

Something new for Earth Day

<<updated 20090424>>

As my patience with Second Life wanes, and I wait for more architectural input for my next SL build project, I have a dark OpenSim server with no fixed IP.  I’m having stability issues with the Linux SL client, but have upgraded the workstation to Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope.  Google Earth client there is more stable, the NVidia drivers install themselves (sans Envy), and everything Ubuntu-wise seems to be getting incrementally better by the quarter.

I’m grinding some large images that have taught me that one very special difference between Windows XP variants and Windows Server 2003 is the latter’s ability to open files on the high side of 80 GB.  I’d never quite realized it before but the moderately massive mosaics that I have created in years past (edging toward 250 GB single files) actually depended on Server 2003 to get created.  Once the destination file exists, then XP can take it from there, and in all cases Windows Explorer can copy the monster files.  But in that tenuous moment when a mosaic first grabs its space on disk for a huge output—one can’t seem to do that with XP.

So while I’m enjoying Google Earth on Ubuntu, there is something cool that I go back to Windows for, and that’s the new Google Earth browser plug-in.  Since I’m gaining a bit of facility with the keyboard shortcuts in the full-stop Earth client, these all carry over to the plugin.  My first test page has been stood up here and I’ve been deep into four continents with it so far.  I understand that the plugin is only available for Windows and Mac systems at this time.  If you can,  Enjoy!

http://earth.jedi.bz 

Also, as I get even faster with my keyboard navigation of G-Earth, I’ve actually seen some artifacts that are quite familiar from OpenSim.  While zipping about between the Gulf of Yakutat and Canada’s Mount Logan, at certain viewing elevations I can accelerate the point of view forward quite fast.  Doing so in this very mountainous terrain, I saw blocks of terrain standing up along what look like sim edges, resolving in a few seconds as more (sculpty?) bumpmap arrives.  This is the same sort of artifact I’ve seen with terrain sculpties and sometimes, with region crossings in OpenSim.  Also, I’ve found a couple of wild terrain grid errors in G-Earth.  In one, a quarry dug hundreds of feet below sea level, right next to the sea, is displayed as positive elevation (absolute-value terrain, anyone?).  In another, a boundary between US and Canadian terrain has a glacier flowing uphill onto a plateau.  Go figure.  Blame Canada! ;^)

No responses yet